Comments on: About http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com I will publish the unified field theory before 10^18 seconds are up. Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:03:54 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: angryphysicist http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-3066 angryphysicist Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:20:00 +0000 #comment-3066 Hello, I didn't know where to put this, but I stumbled across a book you may be interested in " Density-Matrix Renormalization: A New Numerical Method in Physics Lectures of a Seminar and Workshop Held at the Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden, Germany, August 24th to September 18th, 1998" (available here http://www.springerlink.com/content/rt413t787619/?p=ec5ec39dded849a2a8c021a902104ea4&pi=232) I don't know if it's freely available, but I have access to its chapters from UC Davis...if you'd like, I could send you an ecopy of its chapters. Hello,

I didn’t know where to put this, but I stumbled across a book you may be interested in ” Density-Matrix Renormalization: A New Numerical Method in Physics Lectures of a Seminar and Workshop Held at the Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden, Germany, August 24th to September 18th, 1998″ (available here http://www.springerlink.com/content/rt413t787619/?p=ec5ec39dded849a2a8c021a902104ea4&pi=232)

I don’t know if it’s freely available, but I have access to its chapters from UC Davis…if you’d like, I could send you an ecopy of its chapters.

]]> By: Glenn http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2811 Glenn Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:29:00 +0000 #comment-2811 Just looking around and found your site. Always receptive to anything that tries to look past the patent clerk's rantings. Correct me if you see this differently but I regard the "space time continuum" as undefined and no better than proving theories "by God". An imaginary something in his nothing space. I much prefer aether theory and the work of TJJ See in particular, though most of his math is over my head (only got to Analytic Geometry). Just looking around and found your site. Always receptive to anything that tries to look past the patent clerk’s rantings.
Correct me if you see this differently but I regard the “space time continuum” as undefined and no better than proving theories “by God”. An imaginary something in his nothing space.
I much prefer aether theory and the work of TJJ See in particular, though most of his math is over my head (only got to Analytic Geometry).

]]> By: dan l http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2725 dan l Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:30:16 +0000 #comment-2725 Found a typo in the title "Infrad Correction to Mass I" on this page. I found your site from a comment you made a scienceblogs, and a google search, and I'm enjoying it. Found a typo in the title
“Infrad Correction to Mass I”
on this page.

I found your site from a comment you made a scienceblogs,
and a google search, and I’m enjoying it.

]]> By: Fred http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-757 Fred Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:57:04 +0000 #comment-757 Hello Carl, I've been meaning to forward this site address to you. http://plus.maths.org/competition/ It's a link to Plus Magazine which is holding a math essay competition in several categories. One of the categories is for 'university student and general public entrants.' http://plus.maths.org/competition/guidelines_general.html I thought of you when I first read about it due to your obvious interest and written thoughts concerning math and science. The closing date for entering is March 31, 2008. I hope you'll consider submitting a story as it would be quite interesting to read your entry. I, myself, am contemplating a very short fictional piece to forward. Best wishes, Fred Hello Carl,

I’ve been meaning to forward this site address to you. http://plus.maths.org/competition/
It’s a link to Plus Magazine which is holding a math essay competition in several categories. One of the categories is for ‘university student and general public entrants.’ http://plus.maths.org/competition/guidelines_general.html
I thought of you when I first read about it due to your obvious interest and written thoughts concerning math and science. The closing date for entering is March 31, 2008. I hope you’ll consider submitting a story as it would be quite interesting to read your entry. I, myself, am contemplating a very short fictional piece to forward.

Best wishes, Fred

]]> By: Jay R. Yablon http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-113 Jay R. Yablon Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:54:49 +0000 #comment-113 Hi Carl: I was just about to look up your blog, when lo and behold, a message came into my blog from you. Anyway, thanks for the tip to use worldpress, I think this blogging business is going to be a lot of fun. But this latex stuff, yuk! Any easy way to convert microsoft word equations into latex? Jay. Hi Carl:

I was just about to look up your blog, when lo and behold, a message came into my blog from you.

Anyway, thanks for the tip to use worldpress, I think this blogging business is going to be a lot of fun.

But this latex stuff, yuk! Any easy way to convert microsoft word equations into latex?

Jay.

]]> By: saad http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-49 saad Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:43:04 +0000 #comment-49 you are right! the law was settled for spheres interaction and I made wrong calculations. Thank you for opening my eyes on that point. I was first very disappointed about my approximation, but actually it makes my unification project less difficult to achieve. I’m working on an eather model (not a law) that explains gravity, space-time wrapping, black hole, wave forms using string methodology (not theory) and I would like to send you a copy to get your opinion. I will certainly need 3 or 4 weeks modeling for a first understandable shot. Thank you for your help. you are right! the law was settled for spheres interaction and I made wrong calculations. Thank you for opening my eyes on that point. I was first very disappointed about my approximation, but actually it makes my unification project less difficult to achieve.
I’m working on an eather model (not a law) that explains gravity, space-time wrapping, black hole, wave forms using string methodology (not theory) and I would like to send you a copy to get your opinion. I will certainly need 3 or 4 weeks modeling for a first understandable shot.
Thank you for your help.

]]> By: saad http://carlbrannen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-38 saad Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:36:18 +0000 #comment-38 Hello Since my early studies I realized that the Newton gravitation force law was completely wrong in small distances. I have been fired from the class because my physics teacher was very angry about my claims: How could scientific community accept to use a non accurate law without trying to correct it!!? I think that mass explanation is something simple and reachable. I’m working on a gravity model and I’m facing the same problem again! The Newton force law is wrong with small distances and high masses. And there is no other referential! I can not build a model based on wrong gravity approximation In my new web site I propose a new gravitational approximation and I would like to have your opinion on it. Thank you Saad Hello
Since my early studies I realized that the Newton gravitation force law was completely wrong in small distances. I have been fired from the class because my physics teacher was very angry about my claims: How could scientific community accept to use a non accurate law without trying to correct it!!?

I think that mass explanation is something simple and reachable. I’m working on a gravity model and I’m facing the same problem again! The Newton force law is wrong with small distances and high masses. And there is no other referential!

I can not build a model based on wrong gravity approximation

In my new web site I propose a new gravitational approximation and I would like to have your opinion on it.

Thank you
Saad

]]>