For those of you who aren’t familiar with blue collar knots, “ABOK” means “The Ashley Book of Knots,” an ecyclopedic book on knots written in 1944 that has since become the reference for knot identification. I think it was my maternal grandfather that gave me my, somewhat rare, now the worse from love and use, 1st edition copy back in the 1960s; but what with the natural self-naturedness of a boy I cannot recall for sure. #2217 refers to a particularly handsome knot in the chapter “The Monkey’s Fist and Other Knot Coverings.” To justify “handsome” requires a sample photo from cbrew6 on Knot Heads World Wide:

This knot is “tied on the table,” which means that one uses a diagram to draw it. From a topological point of view, a table diagram in this case is a mapping of the surface of the sphere to the plane. A line drawing shows the path that the cord takes. The path is a loop, that is, it ends at the same point at which it starts. The path is restricted to never cross itself twice at a single point. At each crossing, some sort of notation indicates which line is to be on top, but for planar knots like the above, it is arranged so that the cord will weave over, under, over, under … And it is a trivial fact of practical folks topology that one can always assign such a pattern.

The above knot is “5-ply,” by which is meant that the knot was tied once and then duplicated four times by following the initial path over again four times. This is made convenient by the fact that the end point for the knot is the same as the initial point. The difficulty in designing knots like these is to arrange this, that is, one wishes the path to be a single loop.

ABOK #2217 has a 4-fold symmetry axis. In the above example, the axis runs vertically, roughly between the two purple cords extending through the top. This allows us to show how it was designed, perhaps, and to redraw its tying diagram into a form that is easier to generalize. The 4-fold axis is around the center of the tie diagram:

In the above knot, the bights are made of 3 or 4 cords. This is ideal for a covering knot; a larger number would tend to let the encased object peak through:

A convenient way of designing a knot is to assume that it has some symmetry and to draw a region that can be stitched together several times. In stitching together two regions, we will simply number the free ends from each region and connect them in order.

Since the knot is going to have at least one 4-bight, we might as well assume that the knot has a 4-fold axis through a 4-bight. The regions we’ll stick together will need to be approximately diamond shaped, with a height around half their width:

The diamond shaped regions need to be approximately flat. This means that they should be constructed from 4-bights, that is, squares. And this construction works for knot #2217. The diamond shaped pattern is:

The diamond shaped region has 7 ends on the left and 7 ends on the right. Numbering these in order, we find that the diamond pattern defines a permutation which is a 7-cycle, (1475263):

Furthermore, the mapping takes rising lines to rising lines except for the top and bottom two rows. This ensures that there aren’t any sudden direction changes in the middle regions.

To get the 2217 knot, we use the above diagram four times. In fact, a single cycle knot would result if we reproduced it N times providing N is not a multiple of 7. More generally, for this sort of scheme to work, we need for the section of the knot to be an M-cycle if it has 2M free ends, and we need to reproduce it a number of times that is relatively prime to M. This is the equivalent of a well known result for the Turk’s heads. Ashley managed to write out a table classifying Turk’s head knots by number of bights and number of leads for up to 40 leads and 24 bights (in our example, there are 4 bights and 7 leads) but didn’t quite manage to figure out the relatively prime detail. As close as he could come was “A good practical way to plan Turk’s Heads is to take a prime number for the larger dimension (5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 37, 41, etc.) and to use any smaller number, either odd or even, for the other dimension.” This quote is from ABOK # 1314. An example of several Turk’s heads, along with an ABOK #2217, see: Bell rope with ABOK #2217. For those who aren’t knotees, I should mention that white cord is the most difficult to tie as it shows errors most easily.

So, drawn in Turk’s head form, here’s my simplified diagram for the ABOK #2217:

This means we now also have a decent covering knot with a 3-fold axis of symmetry instead of 4. Such a knot has 30 crossings where #1314 has 40. Does the ABOK list such a knot? No, we may have found a new covering knot, assuming that it’s not already in the literature. But in any case we had fun and the method should generalize to produce other beautiful knots.

P.S. For any sort of plane (or spherical surface) polygonal region, Euler characteristic tells us that V-E+F = 2 where V = the number of vertices, E = number of edges, and F = the number of faces. For planar knots, E = 2F so this reduces to V = F+2. For this knot, V=10B, F = 10B+2, where “B” is the number of bights. For ABOK #2217, B=4.

For an arbitrary convex polygon with all vertices having four faces meet (as applies to a loop) and assembled from 4A triangles and B squares, V = 3A+B, E= 6A + 2B, F = 4A+B so we have (3A+B)-(6A+2B)+(4A+B) = 2 or A=2. So there will be 8 triangles and B squares. This suggests that the most symmetric covering knot will be one that distributes the 8 triangles as evenly as possible around the sphere. For knot ABOK #2217, the 8 triangles are distributed with a 4A2 symmetry. A more symmetric symmetry would be cubic, with the triangles on the corners of the cube. That is approximately obtained when the #2217 is tied with three bights instead of four. Of the 8 triangles, two are on the north and south poles. The rest alternate equally spaced above and below the equator. This is as close as you can get to cubic symmetry:

I may tie a 3-bight knot and put a picture up here. And sorry for the rough diagrams, WordPress has just changed their software and it defaults to medium resolution on my efficient little PNG files.

P.S. The “Turk’s Head” method of tying ABOK #2217 and variations works quite nicely. I’ll put up a series of photos showing how to do this soon. And the 3-bight version is a pretty knot:

It’s clear that with a minor modification, you can tie a #2217 on a Turk’s head cylinder very easily. I’m going to pick up some material and demonstrate this.

Also, I’m looking into more complicated near spherical knot coverings. I’d like something with near icosahedral symmetry.

Carl:

I get a great surpise, to see that you are interested in knots too.

So you know Bud Brewer, with who i have exanged some mails.

Once, I evolved a knot derived from two ABOK #2360, one inverted respect the first and joined by

a crossing that at the end and as told me a great knottyer, Barry Brown, it comme from a 3×9 TH

that as you know its an impossible knot with a single line.

Barry sent me some diagrams to tye the knot in TH form, and the most important an article on the “Knotting Matters” magazine from IGKT on the relation beetwen TH and Monkey Fists.

May the text be found in KHWW, by Patrick Ducey

if I remember well.

As I’m a diletante, by now my interest is in mainfolds and branes, 3D sections of a nD bulk and this things you know much much better

than me.

Steve

Hi, Carl,

If you’re still in Washington State, the President of the IGKT is your neighbor. He got the job because there’s no point looking for anyone else with his skill level, intelligence, and comprehensive knowledge.

Okay, he’d probably call himself “former”, but try to get Jimmy Carter or one of the Bushes to take the same appellation…

Send me an E-mail with IGKT somewhere in the Subject (so I don’t cull it as spam — yes, this is my “okay to post on the Internet” address) if you’re interested in meeting him.

I think you’ll be pleased. He can show you spherical coverings that would make your favorite euphemism for joy water.

And please feel free to delete this post. I’d E-mail you directly if I could find your address.

Jimbo The Kinky

Wretched Knottyer of Lower-Eastern Cordage

Knots tied while you wait, on or off the bight.

Eyes Spliced. Splices Eyed. Cross-Eyed Splices still our specialty.

Of course I want to see those spherical coverings, especially if I can photograph them and blog them. My email address gets so much spam that I can’t imagine writing it here is going to significantly change the amount, but let’s code it up anyway:

carl what brannenworks dc

In the above, what becomes an at-sign, and “dc” is dot com, and of course all spaces are removed.

I was Googling my name and found this post. I don’t know if I will check back here for replies, so please post questions for me at KHWW.net.

I have posted templates for several spherical turksheads knots at the KHWW website. Look under tutorials, then look for my name. Most of them print at a size that will wrap around a toilet paper tube, others are designed to wrap around a PVC mandrel. Similar to the posting on this site for “A new way to tie an old knot”, it uses a cylinder to tie a spherical knot.

There are several different knots templates posted, and many more are possible. If you are looking for a specific number of bights or leads, I can help you make your own template, or I can draft one up to print at the right size to wrap around any cylinder you have. I also use PVC as a mandrel becuase it is cheap and easy to work.

Pat Ducey

Reblogged this on Paracord Creations.